Liberal media wanted Trump to investigate, so he's gonna do it and liberal heads explode

It is commonly known that the overwhelming majority of voter fraud is propagated by the Democrat Party. They must not believe they can win elections fair and square. The Project Veritas videos and John Podesta leaving his emails unguarded was an eye-opener to those who were still skeptical of Democrat cheating.

Running up to the election, there were some governors and mayors who encouraged illegal aliens, who are not U.S. citizens, to vote. These governors and mayors were all far left-wing progressives who have no respect for the rule of law. 2016 was not the first election in which illegals voted.

According to a study by Old Dominion University professors Jesse Richman and David Earnest, up to 2.8 million non-citizens voted in the 2008 presidential election. This study was published in 2014 in the Electoral Studies journal.

According to The Daily Caller, Harvard political scientist Stephen Ansolabehere said "the likely percent of non-citizen voters in recent U.S. elections is zero."

???

This guy must be on heroin. Zero? Really? Remember, this is the esteemed institution that employs fake Indian Elizabeth Warren. Harvard is a volcano of kooks.

Then, just before the 2016 election, Virginia Democrat Governor Terry McAuliffe released 60,000 felons from prison and restored their right to vote. Hillary Clinton handily won the state.

Donald Trump easily won the election, although Hillary had more raw votes. California alone gave Hillary the raw vote win. That is why there is an Electoral College. So during Trump's second full day, the liberal media climbed all over spokesman Sean Spicer about Trump's claim that a few million non-citizens voted in the election. They asked why the President isn't trying to prove his comment, which the liberals do not believe.

So Trump said he will investigate and determine how many illegal votes were cast. So now Democrats are whining about how the election is state-controlled, and Trump has no jurisdiction. Never mind that on his way out the door, Barrack Obama illegally federalized the Presidential election.

Of course states that encouraged illegals to vote aren't going to investigate illegals and other non-citizens voting. The lawless Democrat governors of those states do not believe they did anything wrong. After all, Democrats must win elections!

In order to root these problems out, the feds must go in and determine what happened in the latest election. Cheaters are very opposed to this. The left doesn't want the truth to come out. That is why this must be investigated.

Democrats Still Don't Get It

Donald J. Trump is now President of the United States. So what's next for the Democrat party? Do they bounce back as political parties inevitably do, or does the party disappear into history? This is a valid question based on the decimation of the party during the Obama Administration and Democrat's reaction to their massive defeats.

Leading Democrats think Trump's victory was a fluke. They have produced all kinds of crazy excuses as to why Hillary Clinton lost. The latest justification is that the Russians somehow helped Trump get elected.

???

Democrats spend much time separated from reality. What about reports that Hillary was helped by Ukraine and German Chancellor Angela Merkel? I guess it's only bad if it helps Republicans.

The first obvious reason for Trump's win is the fact that Hillary is a lying, corrupt criminal. John Podesta made the password for his email "password." Yes, the man responsible for running Hillary's campaign is really that stupid. Half of the planet probably hacked his emails, so nobody knows who WikiLeaks got his emails from. What matters is that emails were exposed, they were accurate, and they proved many things, including corruption by both Hillary and the media.

Another reason for Trump's win was the complete and total failure and corruption of the Obama administration. Working-class Americans (that's most of us), were sick and tired of failed liberal crap. Obamacare took away meaningful health insurance coverage for millions of Americans, created the 29-hour workweek for million of Americans, drastically reducing their pay, and cost Americans their doctors and insurance plans, things Obama said would not happen.

Obama's Attorneys General were corrupt. He released POW's so they could return to the battlefield to kill Americans and our allies. And the list goes on and on and on. Americans down on the farm, the factories and the unemployed had had enough.

Another failure of the left was sticking to their tried and true strategy: identity politics. Blacks will vote for the Democrat. Hispanics will vote for the Democrat. Jews will vote for the Democrat. People in Midwest industrial states like Michigan and Wisconsin will vote for the Democrat. So Hillary ignored all of these people. Mistake. Instead, the Democrats focused on women and Florida, and to hell with everyone else.

Just to be sure, Hillary spent over $1 billion to get herself elected. After all, in politics money equals win.

Hold the phone.

Social media is where it's at these days. And that doesn't take dump trucks full of money. Social media takes expertise. And Trump followed the traditional Republican approach. Help all people, not buckets full of people. Times are changing, and Democrats are getting left behind.

So you're thinking, change! That would be the smart thing to do, and there are Democrats who get it. But they have been pushed down by the elites and remain a powerless minority. Such as Ohio's Tim Ryan. Democrats missed a huge opportunity when they failed to make Ryan their House leader.

Instead, they re-elected 76-year-old Nancy Pelosi, who usually sounds like she is in need of a dementia test. She is in complete denial. She believes Trump's win was a fluke assisted by the Russians. Or James Comey. Or Wikileaks. Or fake news. Or trash publications at checkout lines. The Electoral College (everyone knew the rules going in. They haven't changed since 1788). Or whatever lame excuse the left can come up with.

But there is a problem with all of those excuses. It wasn't just Hillary. Democrats got slaughtered all over the country. Liberalism and socialism, the fundamental beliefs of the Democrat Party, have failed worldwide whenever it has been tried. Barrack Obama is a classic example of why liberalism and socialism does not fit under our Constitution. Countless times Obama took the lazy way out and bypassed congress to make laws himself. That is what dictators do. Fortunately, most of that will be undone this week. Our Constitution will be followed.

In recent years, Democrats have lost both houses of congress, the oval office, 1000 state legislative seats and 12 governorship's. 68 of the nation's 98 partisan state legislatures are Republican. So tell me again about the Russians.

So the left has responded to this with riots. They're burning cars and smashing windows. Madonna said she is seriously thinking about burning down the White House. Would that mean Trump would no longer be President? Yes, people are that stupid.

So the Democrat Party will cling to their identity politics, their elites and their mobs. R.I.P.

Sports Broadcasts and Awards Shows No Place For Politics

ESPN is hemorrhaging potential viewers. Big time. They have lost millions of potential viewers in 2016. More and more people are cutting the cord and using streaming services for their TV reception. And ESPN isn't necessarily on everyone's must-see TV.

This hits ESPN right where it hurts. In the pocket book. Fewer viewers means lower advertising rates. Networks generally give advertisers a guarantee of a minimum number of viewers. Miss that mark, and the advertiser gets a partial refund. That is not good for ESPN.

Despite the loss of potential viewers, ESPN continues to annoy half of their audience with left-wing political comments during sports broadcasts. Those comments are generally accepted by ESPN management. But if someone utters a conservative comment, there is a good chance a suspension or firing will follow.

Now when I turn on a ballgame, I want it to be an escape from real world problems. I don't to hear about politics. I deal with politics every day, and a ballgame is supposed to be entertainment. I want to focus on touchdowns, tackles, hits RBI's or whatever is applicable to what I'm watching. No politics.

Then there is the obnoxious Hollywood Left. They somehow believe that since they're famous actors, they are qualified to teach us about politics.

???

We saw a perfect example of this last week. The Golden Globes is an awards show for movies and television. My wife likes to see the outfits. Meryl Streep was given a Lifetime Achievement Award, which she richly deserves. When accepting the award, Streep unloaded a lengthy hate filled rant against Donald Trump. She obviously preferred the other candidate, a lying, corrupt criminal.

Now I never use Streep as my political analyst, so I don't know why I would care about her misinformed opinions. But she used receiving the prestigious award to spew her personal political beliefs, She even called the millionaires victims. That's when I turned it off.

Just like ballgames, Hollywood awards shows are not appropriate for political speech. When politics seeps into ballgames or Hollywood awards shows, I change the channel.

History is history. It is not 2017

John Lewis

Georgia congressman John Lewis stirred up a hullabaloo when he said Donald Trump would not be a legitimate President.

???

This is a United States congressman! Now I understand Lewis is a liberal and no fan of Trump. I am a conservative and am no fan of Barrack Obama. I opposed Obama whenever I felt he was wrong, which has been most of the time. This is how politics is done in America. But Obama is my President. Any cheating aside, Obama was legally elected. Conservatives didn't need safe spaces or counselors. We didn't cry and claim Obama wasn't legitimate. We lost an election.  We sucked it up and moved on.

The left in this country has been in a nonstop hissy fit ever since the lying, corrupt and criminal Hillary Clinton lost. Apparently Democrats feel entitled to permanent rule. Not sure why that would be. One party has never been entitled to permanent power. FDR (a Democrat) tried, but the 22nd amendment was passed in 1947, limiting the President to two terms.

Barack Obama hates the 22nd amendment.

The Hollywood left, the MSM media and all of the other crybabies out there need to get over themselves. You didn't get your way. So what? You're not always going to get your way in life, so you better learn to deal with that. You are making complete asses of yourselves.

But for a well-respected congressman of 30 years to say the President will not be legitimate is just childish. Lewis sets a bad example for all Americans, including our youth. John Lewis should be ashamed of himself. He obviously has the right to not like Trump, and to fight against him. But for crying out loud, grow the hell up.

Lewis has very selective rage. There are now reports that Ukraine helped Hillary. Fake news? I havo no idea. I don't hear Lewis whining about that. We know Obama tried to keep Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu from being re-elected. Not a word from John Lewis. That is because he is a left-wing hack.

Now because Lewis has a commendable history fighting for equal rights, Democrats and the MSM think this gets him a lifetime pass from criticism. I think not. His history is good, but this is 2017. His refusal to accept Donald Trump as our legitimate President really makes him unfit to serve in congress. It is time for Lewis to go home to his crime-ridden district and retire.

Hillary Clinton lost because of Hillary Clinton. Period

President Obama has decided to sanction Russia not because they influenced our presidential election (because they didn't), but because the Russians have practiced years of unscrupulous cyber activity. Much of the media is not reporting this correctly. Fake news.

I'm sure the Russians are cyber-attacking us everyday. I presume we are cyber-attacking Russia everyday. We know Obama likes to listen to Angela Merkel's cellphone.

Democrats are still trying to come up with why Hillary Clinton lost. It wasn't because of Russia. Or James Comey. Or Julian Assange. Or the media. It wasn't fake news. It wasn't people misreading their Facebook feeds. It wasn't The Onion. It wasn't rigged voting machines and it wasn't a rigged Electoral College.

Hillary Clinton lost because she is a lying, corrupt criminal. Period.

The corrupt left-wing media (that has now been proven, too) is lying to you when they say Russia influenced the election. Repeat - they did not.

Democrats have turned America into a political sewer. The DNC fixing the primaries and the Project Veritas videos proves it. Of course Obama and Hillary are both truth-challenged, so they will never admit that. They will always try to blame somebody else.

So what exactly did the Russians supposedly do?

Hillary Clinton will never take responsibility for losing the election. She has and will continue to blame everyone under the sun for her losing, because dammit, she's supposed to be President. She won't consider her lies, massive corruption, her lack of trustworthiness, her outdated, failed liberal proposals, pay for play, perjuring herself before congress and a bevy of other faults she has. It had to be somebody else.

The latest target: Vladimir Putin. The CIA states Russia did indeed interfere with our election. But how? Details and proof have not been divulged.

Progressive kook Jill Stein thinks floppy disks were inserted into voting machines, changing votes.

???

Did she say floppy disks? Hello Jill, this is 1990 calling. I'm pretty certain there wasn't any Russians going from polling place to polling place inserting a floppy disk into the voting machines. Where in the hell would you insert it? Is this like hacking gas pumps?

So just what supposedly happened? Putin says he had nothing to do with it. OK, maybe he's not the most honest witness. Are the liberals talking about the emails? Julian Assange swears Russia was not the source of the emails. It was a DNC member in Washington. Assange does not have a history of equivocating. Are we going to get sucked into World War III because of Hillary Clinton?

The biggest problem for the left is that the emails are true. We, the American Voter, are entitled to know these things. If Hillary wanted to win, she shouldn't have been so corrupt. She shouldn't have lied so much. She shouldn't have perjured herself before congress, and have a party afterword to boot. She shouldn't have had an unsecured server in her basement, then sent and received classified information through that server. She shouldn't have had a career of failure dating back to her firing from the Watergate Committee because of dishonesty. She shouldn't have shared classified information with unauthorized personnel.  She should have campaigned in the blue collar states in the middle of the country that were assumed to be blue. Blah blah blah...

The Russians had nothing to do with any of this. Hillary lost because she was a bad, corrupt candidate. She lost to a candidate who out-hustled her. Donald Trump understands how the farmer in Wisconsin and the factory worker in Michigan are being crushed by President Obama. Hillary is an elitist who thinks she is entitled to be President.

Well, no she's not.

Yes, I am concerned if a foreign country is meddling in our elections, just like Israel was pissed when Obama meddled in theirs. But the most corrupt administration in U.S. history claims Russia somehow interfered with our election, but show no proof. Obama originally said Russia was not involved in our election, now he claims they were.

My B.S. meter is pegging in the red.

Why our Presidential Elections aren't majority rules

I've been watching all the silly protesting going on today in the various state capitals around the country. Arrogant self-entitled Democrats continue to whine about President-Elect Trump. The nation is doomed. Michelle Obama told Oprah Winfrey we have no hope.

???

We have had no hope for the past eight years. We were told that elections have consequences, and Obama won. He was unable to work with Republicans in the congress, so his lack of leadership forced him to become a dictator and rule via executive order, often illegally. President Obama released POW's back to the battlefield so they can kill more Americans as well as our allies. The word for that is "treason."

The past eight years have been the most troubling and frightening time in my 55 years on this rock. It is time for a results-oriented government, not a government where the primary objective is to implement a political ideology.

I saw one guy on the tube today screaming that they are disenfranchised, and the candidate with the most votes should be the winner. Been hearing that a lot lately, and it is about the most stupid, half-witted thing to say. If the most votes decided the winner, California, New York and Illinois would always decide who is President. If I were a lefty, I'd love that, because those states are hopelessly liberal.

We are not a democracy. We are a democratic-republic. Here's why:

A pure democracy is majority rules, which is often referred to as mob rule. Let's say we have three people, Andy, Bob and Carl. They are hopelessly stranded on a mountain in a massive blizzard. They have no way of communicating out. No phones, no two-way radios, nothing. After a couple of days, it occurs to them that they will die of starvation because they ran out of food, and still no hope of being rescued.

They decide that one of them will have to die so the other two can eat him. Carl says he and Bob should eat Andy. "Oh no," shouts Andy. "We should eat Carl." So the three of them voted. Andy voted to eat Carl. Bob jumped in and said yes, we'll eat Carl. Carl voted that Andy be eaten.

So it was 2-1 that Carl be eaten. So Andy and Bob killed Carl and ate him.

Do you see the problem here? Do you see why this doesn't work? The mob decided that Carl was to be eaten, so he was killed. Sucks to be Carl.

If the President was determined with mob rule, the same three liberal states would always determine who the President will be. The other 47 states will have no say whatsoever. Hence the President would always be a Democrat.

Not going to happen.

Perhaps the most incredible thing is these liberal kooks think a lying, corrupt criminal who gave away state secrets and perjured herself before congress would be preferred over Trump. Really? Me thinks many of these people have their heads stuck up their a#@%$.

Why Hillary Lost

If you wanted to win Hillary, you shouldn't have been a lying, corrupt criminal. That creep Podesta shouldn't have sent all those emails. You shouldn't have used an unsecured server in your basement to handle classified emails. You should have listened to the President and stayed the hell away from Sydney Blumenthal. You shouldn't have repeatedly lied to the American people and perjured yourself in front of congress. Your constant whining and blaming of others proves the American voters made the right decision. 

Keep the Electoral Voters, Bag the Electors

The elitists on the left are too arrogant to accept defeat. They cannot believe there are people, lots of people, who believe differently than they do. So they call us all sorts of nasty names. Typical Democrat playbook.

So now they're trying to somehow defeat Donald Trump in the Electoral College vote on Monday.

???

They are inundating Republican Electors with mountains of trash. One Michigan Elector said on TV that he has received 60,000 emails. He then showed a laundry basket crammed with snail mail. They all want this Elector to vote for anyone but Trump. This Elector made it very clear that he is voting for Trump. Period. Even with the massive Democrat cheating in Detroit, the people of Michigan chose Trump. I have heard similar stories from other Republican Electors.

What do the sore losers hope to accomplish? In the nearly impossible chance that the House of Representatives has to decide who is President, it will be Trump. The Senate will make Mike Pence the Vice President. So?

Donald Trump was elected in a legal election. The whiners don't like that. They don't want a Democratic Republic. They want a dictatorship and they get to decide who the dictator is. They want another failure like Barack Obama.

Now the left wants to eliminate the Electoral College. Not because that's what best for America. They want to eliminate the Electoral College because their corrupt candidate lost. Which shows a massive misunderstanding of civics. They would be happy if California and New York selected the President and to hell with everyone else.

I suggest we keep the electoral votes for the states, but bag the electors. When each state certifies the vote, that's it. It is official. We will know the winner on election night or the next morning. All of the current voting rules would remain the same. Just no electors. Of course this would require a Constitutional Amendment, which is a difficult process that takes a lot of time. But hey - Republicans pretty much control the entire country now, so why not?

Then this stupid nonsense the left is trying to pull would never happen again.

I Hope...

• Nancy Pelosi remains Democrat leader in the House of Representatives.
• Keith Ellison becomes leader of the DNC.
• Hillary Clinton supports recounts is as many states as she wants, and still loses every one.
• Democrats continue to push for tax increases.
• Crybaby college students continue to demand safe places on campus.
• Crybaby college students continue to demand their schools become sanctuary schools.
• Progressive mayors continue to defy federal law and retain sanctuary status for their cities, as crime rises in those cities.
• Paid protesters continue to protest the election of Donald Trump, despite most of them having not voted.
• Black Lives Matters becomes one of the most powerful groups in the nation.
• Paid protesters and economic morons continue to protest for $15/hour.
• Cities and states that raised their minimum wage continue to lose jobs due to the increase in minimum wage.
• Mainstream media continues to be in the tank for the left.
• Progressives continue to support the man-made climate change hoax.
• Progressives continue to support prosecuting man-made climate change deniers.
• Progressives continue their assault on the First Amendment.
• Progressives continue their assault on the Second Amendment.
• The left continues to support destruction of the coal industry.
• Democrats continue to support elimination of the Electoral College.
• The left continues to consider Christians as extreme.
• The left supports Sharia Law.
• Democrats continue to support open borders.
• Democrats continue to support rights and benefits to illegal immigrants while 22 veterans a day commit suicide.

Why do I hope these things happen? Because then the Democrat Party will disappear forever, much like the Whig Party disappeared in 1854. 

An Inconvenient Truth About Millionaires and Billionaires

Millionaires and billionaires. Generally speaking, the most successful among us. The left likes to use the term to denote something evil. Hillary Clinton likes to use the term despite the fact she is a millionaire (yet claims to have been broke in 2001).

"Millionaires and billionaires" joined the lexicon during George W. Bush's administration. The left used the term to describe recipients of a tax cut Bush championed. That tax cut was across the board for all taxpayers. Since the wealthy pay most of the taxes, yeah, they got the biggest tax cut. If you didn't pay any taxes, you didn't get a tax cut. You don't have to be Phi Beta Kappa to figure that out.

Now Hillary uses the term to describe benefactors of Donald Trump's tax proposal. She complains Trump would give a tax cut to himself and his millionaire and billionaire friends.

The hidden message here is you are poor because somebody else is rich. It's the old class warfare card, one of the Democrats' favorite strategies. Divide and conquer. Rich vs poor, black vs white, man vs woman, etc. Identity politics. Democrats like to put groups of people in boxes and address the boxes separately. They don't like to treat everyone the same. That's not fair.

???

The left wants to use tax laws to punish the rich. Hard work and achievement must be penalized while laziness is rewarded. Democrats strive for "fairness" by demanding more equal outcomes. In other words, shrink the pay gap between CEO's and cashiers within the same company. Of course the biggest factor in determining outcome is effort, and human nature prevents equal effort. Somehow liberals always manage to miss that point.

Short of stuffing it in their mattress, burying it in the backyard or giving it to government in taxes, whatever millionaires and billionaires do with their money benefits everyone. Buy a yacht and a Gulfstream 6 - blue collar jobs. Put it into banks - money for car loans, mortgages and other types of loans. Invest in Wall Street - capital for companies to expand and create new jobs. Municipal bonds - provides money to government for roads, bridges, convention centers and other public projects.

None of these are bad. It's all good.

It is the folks working in those factories and in those expanding companies. It is the folks buying cars, getting mortgages and starting small businesses. It is the folks building the bridges, highways and convention centers. Union. Non-union. All skin colors. Men and women. All orientations. Everyone benefits because there are millionaires and billionaires. Beware of anyone who tries to convince you otherwise.

So the next time you hear Hillary or one of her mouthpieces squawking about millionaires and billionaires, implying they are the reason you are not rich, your BS meter should be pegging in the red.

Flippant Stray Thoughts for Monday 8/22/2016...

A local TV news observation: I record the 6 am news from Channels 2 and 5 every morning. It is fairly common for Channel 2 to have overnight news items that Channel 5 missed...

Channel 17's Jen French has left for greener pastures in Albuquerque NM. Best wishes to her...

Channel 4 to 23-year veteran Dennis Ferrier: Get the hell out...

Channel 4 to Nancy Van Camp (22 years): Ditto...

Ferrier was tossed immediately after returning from his father's funeral. Broadcasting is a tough business. Trust me, I get it. But WSMV is obviously having some serious financial issues. Van Camp was replaced with an obviously cheaper replacement. When I worked in broadcasting, I referred to this as the 50/50 rule. No matter how good you are, if they find someone half your age willing to work for half of your salary, you are history...

Rudy Kalis shared his thoughts on this cowardice via social media...

They probably spent six figures (at least) to erect a free-standing tower with a radar ball on top of it. Head south towards Nolensville and you'll see it in Williamson County. They could have just as well taken that money and thrown it in the street in front of the station and gotten the same result...

As I commented earlier, if that money pit made any difference, then when Channel 4 shows their radar superimposed with the National Weather Bureau radars everyone else uses, the blobs should jump forward whenever the Williamson radar passes, then jump back when the next government radar passes. That doesn't happen...

If you're Joe Nashville sitting at home watching this, you probably don't understand the significance of "middle Tennessee's only live radar." That's because there isn't any. They piss away all that money, then subject a 22-year meteorologist to the 50/50 rule. And Ferrier was one of the best they had...

Channels 4 and 5 are like the U.S. and the Soviet Union back in the day. The Soviet Union eventually fell apart after spending themselves into oblivion trying to keep up with the U.S. Channel 4 is the Soviet Union. They are a sinking ship...

I stopped watching Channel 4's news, and discovered Channel 2 does a helluva good job. Without all the expensive gimmicks...

Channel 2's new chief meteorologist, Danielle Breezy, who came here from Boston, is doing a great job. Welcome to Music City! It's always tough following a legend...

For example, that whiny over-hyped morning guy on WSIX-FM...

Big lib Bill Freeman is hosting a Hillary Clinton fundraiser tomorrow. They expect to raise $1 million. Tim Kaine will be in town for the event. Freeman has already raised untold millions for Hillary...

 Hillary tried to throw Colin Powell under the bus, but Powell is having nothing of it...

Clinton and Obama: it's always somebody else's fault...

Donald Trump will bring millions of new voters to the polls in November. People who have never voted before, or haven't voted in a long time. Are those folks represented in the gazillion polls that are out there? I ask because I have a funny feeling they are not...

OMG! A black female Republican Vanderbilt professor was on Fox News over the weekend. Didn't know such a person existed...

Why do people try to swim across the Cumberland River? There is a high probability for a very bad outcome...

Till next time, see ya...

I swear to God, if Hillary...

...was walking down the street during a rally and pulled a hand grenade out of her pantsuit, pulled the pin and lobbed it into a crowd and a dozen people are killed, Loretta Lynch would look the other way and say 'nothing to see here.' Why not? Hillary already has the blood of thousands on her corrupt little hands.

This woman can do NOTHING to get indicted by the Obama administration. I don't need to reset everything here. RedState readers are fully aware of the corruption, which has trickled down to the Department of Justice, the FBI, the State Department, the IRS and who knows where else. So now we learn the DOJ has declined the FBI's request to investigate the corrupt as hell Clinton Foundation. The only way they could make it more obvious is if they came out and said, 'Yes, we are corrupt and we're getting away with it'.

I blame the Republican majority in congress for doing NOTHING to stop this monster in the White House. Obama could have been impeached for any number of things, not the least of which is treason. Obama released POW's to the battlefield so they can kill Americans and our allies. The penalty for treason is death.

But since the congressional Republicans have sat on their hands, Obama sees a green light. He knows he will not be challenged, so the corruption gets worse and worse. And trust me, he's not done yet.

The mainstream media is a co-conspirator with House Republicans. I've been watching CNN lately, and their spin is beyond belief. No matter what Hillary says or does, CNN stays focused on what Trump said. DOJ refuses to investigate the Clinton Foundation, and they obsessively focus on Trump. The Donald says maybe 2nd Amendment supporters will be enough to keep Hillary out of the White House so she cannot appoint any Supreme Court Justices, and before you know it, Trump was endorsing violence and possible assassination! 

???

Where in the hell did that come from? Seriously, where does that crap come from? Comprehension is a major part of journalism and communications, yet the media has no ability to understand words. For crying out loud, they blamed Sarah Palin for Gabby Giffords getting shot, because Palin had an image of a cross-hair in an ad. You can't make this stuff up.

I don't know if it's a mental health issue or what, but the wild claims coming from the left and their media buddies are preposterous.

Trump's Arrogance = Dem's Best Weapon

The problem with trying to support Donald Trump is, when the left attacks him, they are usually correct. Liberals do sometimes twist his words to suit their needs, such as claiming Trump said immigrants are criminals and rapists. (that's not what Trump said) But for the most part, they're right, and there is no way to defend him.

How in the world anyone can call this big-government liberal a conservative is beyond me.

Trump and Hillary both have shameful pasts. Clinton's may be worse, but neither one is sitting in the church choir. Since Hillary is a corrupt, hateful person who supports proven to be failed liberal policies, I want to vote for Trump. I really do. But he makes that damn near impossible to do. I don't want to vote for Trump because I like him, because I don't. I want to vote for Trump because Hillary is so corrupt she doesn't even know what the truth is anymore.

Hardly a day goes by without Trump shoving an entire shoe store down his throat. Then he'll usually double and triple-down on his ignorance. Case in point: The Khan family. Trump claimed he had to attack because Mr. Khan attacked him at the DNC.

???

No idiot, the Democrats baited you. They know the slightest provocation will push Trump into Stupid Mode. Then out pours diarrhea of the mouth. Then the Democrats (rightfully) attack him for his stupid comments, and on and on and on.

The left can pull Trump's strings like he's a puppet. Democrats can control what Trump says, and they know it. Say hello to President Clinton 2.0. Heaven help us.

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. If Trump continues to allow himself to be baited by the left, he is a certain loser. As hard as this is to believe, Trump is more arrogant and is more of a narcissist than Barrack Obama. Didn't think that was possible.

If Trump doesn't change immediately, we are all doomed...

Huh?

Out on the campaign trail Saturday, Hillary Clinton said Donald Trump has a dark view of America. She then said Trump is wrong, and she believes America's best days are ahead of us.

???

I think she was trying to say their views are diametrically opposed to each other, but they are not about the same thing.

Trump's reference is to the present. And by most accounts, he's right. One of the first things Barrack Obama did when he became President was to change the formula used to calculate the unemployment rate, making comparisons to previous administrations impossible. Obama's way makes the unemployment rate lower, leaving us with a bogus number.

That's why we have record or near record levels for food stamps and low labor participation rate. The Obama administration can lie and fudge the numbers all they want, but the folks across the country know things are anything but great. The Obama administration is a complete train wreck, and Obama is easily the most corrupt President in America's history. They don't even try to hide their corruption. They do it right out in the open, because they know they will get away with their corruption because both the media and the spineless Republicans in congress have gone Sgt. Schultz. They see nothing and they hear nothing.

Hillary is talking about the future. What a dumb statement she made. Every America-loving politician (in other words, not Obama) thinks our best days are ahead of us. That line worked for Reagan because he actually did it. No sane person can picture Hillary creating 20 million jobs, because everything she wants to do, from destroying the fossil fuel industry to raising the minimum wage to $15/hour, will destroy jobs.

Trump is running for President because he is pissed off. He is pissed off about the direction this country is going. Anger has started a helluva lot of political careers. I ran for local office back in the day because I was pissed off about the corruption in my town. I'm not a Trump fan, but at least he's running for the right reason.

Hillary is running for President because........ she wants to be President. She has wanted to be President for decades. She wants the power and prestige, and let's face it, the Clinton's have done very well financially from public office.

We are not that stupid out here. Hillary is as corrupt as a $3 bill. Trump is a novice and a blowhard, but he didn't get to where he is in business by not surrounding himself with quality people. I see him doing the same in Washington. I get a tingle running up and down my leg when I think of Attorney General Christie and Secretary of State Corker.

Who do you think Hillary will surround herself with? #Scary

Democrats again ignoring Hillary and the law

As Attorney General Loretta Lynch continues her sworn testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, the Democrat's strategy is clear.

While Republicans are asking probing questions trying to learn why Lynch came to the conclusion that Hillary should not be indicted, despite the law clearly indicating she should be indicted, Democrats are discussing the following:

• Attacking Republicans
• Attacking the NRA
• Racist Police
• Gun Control
• BMI/ASCAP
• Anything but Hillary

Once again, Democrats are making a congressional hearing a sham while Republicans are doing the heavy lifting.

Can Anyone Stop Hillary? (the fix is in)

The Truth About Who's Playing Politics On The Benghazi Committee

Hillary Clinton: preponderance of
evidence indicates guilt.

No sooner had the Benghazi Committee press conference announcing the release of their report ended when the left-wing media spin doctors were already weaving their smoke-screen intended to protect Hillary Clinton.

A CNN reporter, who obviously read and comprehended the entire 800-page report in ten minutes, concluded there was nothing to see here and everyone should move on. She said the report revealed nothing new. Even if that were true, what was already known is certainly bad enough and more than worthy of an indictment.

I haven't read the report, but based on what committee chairman Trey Gowdy and the other committee members stated at the press conference, we learned that Hillary spent over two hours dithering over whether or not the Libyans would be offended if the U.S. sent in reinforcements. This discussion took place during the 8-hour battle, when there was still time to save the lives of two Americans who were killed.

Hillary Clinton has American blood on her hands.

Then there is the adulterated reporting of the infamous 11 hours of sworn testimony Mrs. Clinton gave before the Benghazi Committee. I must be the only person outside of the hearing room who watched the entire eleven hours. It is obvious nobody at CNN did. They just gloss over the fact that Hillary testified that the video was a made-up cover-up to hide the truth of Benghazi, less than two months before Barrack Obama was up for re-election on the premise we were winning the war against radical Islam.

We know this because Hillary told her family while the battle was still happening that the consulate in Benghazi was under an "Al Qaeda-like attack." She told the Egyptian President the same thing the following day. Two weeks after the attack, Obama told the United Nations it was a video. Hillary told the same lie to the victim's families.

There was once another President who attempted a cover-up. That did not work out very well for him. He resigned in disgrace before certain impeachment (congress had a pair back in those days). And nobody died in his scandal.

This was all to get Obama re-elected by politicizing the death of Osama Bin Laden. How could Democrats say they were winning the war when a group of radical Muslims killed four Americans in a U.S. consulate, including the Ambassador. In a country that became destabilized when Obama and Hillary decided a regime change was in order. It doesn't get more shameful than this.

So what about those 11 hours? Even before the hearing took place, Democrats, led by liberal blowhard Elijah Cummings, were accusing Republicans of playing politics in an effort to take down Hillary. So what actually happened?

Since you didn't see it, I will tell you.

The Republicans spent their time asking probing questions, trying to figure out exactly what happened that night. The Democrats spent their time grandstanding, attacking the Republicans on the committee, and praising Hillary at every turn. No wonder Gowdy did not release the report on a bi-partisan bases. Cummings and his ilk did not do a damn thing to ascertain what happened that night.

Now the Democrats whine that $7 million has been spent investigating Hillary.

So?

I guess there is a limit on how much can be spent to weed out corruption. If the price tag gets to $7 Extra Large, that's it. The dirty politician gets away with it, because the investigation reached the spending limit. Oh well.

The left also complains that there has been eight or nine different committees that that has looked into Hillary's actions.

???

What difference does that make? With the White House and the investigation's target doing all they could to stonewall the investigation, of course it took a long time and a lot of committees to get to the truth. There is still new evidence trickling in, as more emails that Hillary tried to hide become known. Just like the mythical spending limit, one should not be able to run out the clock on an investigation.

BTW, the FBI is conducting a criminal investigation, not a background check.

I was once the subject of a background check. After months, it culminated with two FBI agents appearing at my house on a Sunday morning. I was told (not asked) that we were going to have breakfast. Now I knew the government was doing a background check on me, because I had consented to have it.

If you ever want to attract a LOT of attention, go to a popular small town restaurant on a Sunday after church lets out, where EVERYONE in the joint knows who you are, and you are accompanied by two strange men who obviously have a purpose, while you look like you just rolled out of bed (because you did). I could almost hear all the heads turning towards us.

I passed the background check and was offered a sensitive position with Radio Marti in Washington, a semi-clandestine radio station started by President Reagan to broadcast the truth (propaganda?) directly to the Cuban people. I passed and took a position in Florida instead.

Back to Hillary...

Now CNN claims, according to "sources," that Hillary will not be indicted. I think few will be surprised if that's what happens, but it will be a certain reminder that open corruption is alive and well in the Obama administration.

Memo to Marsha Blackburn: I'm not going there with you

I received a fundraising email yesterday from Tennessee Congresswoman Marsha Blackburn. She urged me to help prevent another liberal from moving into the White House.

???

I'm guessing she is talking about Crooked Hillary. Of course it could just as easily be Conman Donnie. Marsha - luv ya long time, but I'm not going there with you.

So this was my response:

"Donald Trump IS a liberal. Democrats have been wrongfully calling Republicans racist for decades, and you support this bigoted lying pig? Very disappointing. My party has left me, therefore I am no longer a Republican. We obviously need to form a conservative party to oppose the now two liberal parties."

Like his good friend Hillary, Trump doesn't believe rules apply to him

Bill and Hillary Clinton have managed over the years to make sure that rules for the common folk do not apply to them. They slip and slime their way out of no end of trouble, although she may have met her match with the current scandals.

Donald Trump is the same way. He believes he gets his own set of rules, and so the low-information voters who cling to his every word like a piglet clings to a sow, believe it's unfair when Trump doesn't get his own special way.

Take the Republication convention for example. Going back to 1860, the rules have been that if nobody gets a majority of delegates on the first ballot at the convention, the delegates are free to vote for whoever they think will best represent the Republican Party.

But for some reason, Trump thinks if he has a plurality (the most delegates but not a majority), he is entitled to the nomination. He wants a special rule just for him.

If that were true, Abraham Lincoln would never had been President. Ten times the Republican Party went to their convention with no candidates having a majority of delegate votes. In seven of those conventions, the candidate going in with the most votes did not get the nomination.

But Trump wants special treatment, because he is....... uh....... Trump.

Another example. Trump threatens to sue anyone who says something about him that he doesn't like. Sort of like a five year old. He whines like the Democrat he is that he is not being treated fairly. I don't know about you, but when I checked into this world, I don't recall ever seeing anything that indicated life would be fair.

But it's alright if he slanders a reporter and tries to destroy her because there was an incident between her and a Trump goon. Why does he do this? Because whether it's $1 billion or $10 billion, Mr. Trump is rich. He knows a mere peasant does not have the resources to defend herself from the big bully.

Trump says whatever comes to mind without thinking about it, no matter how stupid and insane it is. Then when the blowback intensifies, he tries to walk it back and clarifies what he really meant. Examples this week was stating women should be punished if they have an illegal abortion, and saying healthcare and education are two of the three top responsibilities of the federal government.

Trump blow-piece Katrina Pierson explained the abortion comment was a hypothetical, so he didn't have time to think about it.

???

What difference does that make? The question, originally from MSNBC's Chris Mathews, was very clear. If abortion was made illegal, should someone be punished if a woman gets an abortion? After Trump said yes, Matthews asked who?

Now whether you're Pro-Life of Pro-Death, the correct answer should be the abortion provider. But Trump broke out with the woman. The typical Pro-Life answer would be to punish the abortionist and help the woman in any way possible. NOBODY on either side of this issue thinks the woman should be punished.

When Trump's answer exploded in his face the next day, he began to walk it back. Trump has "evolved" on almost every issue, not just abortion, as he tries to masquerade as a Republican.

But if someone else utters a faux pas, Trump will hang that person from a tall tree and never let him forget it. How he treats Ted Cruz is a good example of that. But when Trump told Howard Stern he would support a war in Iraq, but now says he never supported that war, that's OK.

So The Donald and Hillary have a lot in common. They both lie, treat people like crap and think rules and laws don't apply to them.

Don and Hillary. Two peas in a pod.